Sandra/Lastly...

From City of Hope MUSH
Revision as of 12:06, 31 January 2017 by imported>DogThing (Created page with "{{#css: .lastly... td { vertical-align: top; } .lastly... td:first-of-type { white-space: nowrap; } .lastly... a { font-weight: bold; } .lastly... a:after { content: "...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Darker Themes: Given that this character is effectively on her way to leading a double life, I am open to darker themes in my RP. However, and I apologize if this sounds hostile, but I want to be clear: I want there to be some thought, and god's-honest maturity put into what constitutes 'dark.' If you're, for example, the type to throw rape into a scenario simply because it makes a scene 'dark' and 'edgy' by default, we're not going to interface well with one another on a collaborative level. If that style of roleplay works for you, that's fine, but it's not something that I'm interested in. I enjoy more thoughtful explorations of this kind of subject matter, and prefer to RP with players who are willing and able to afford situations and scenarios (such as the aforementioned rape) the kind of respect they deserve, rather than use them as wildcards to pull out at random when nothing else comes to mind.
Metagaming: There is information on this wiki page that could invite metagaming. I want to be clear that, while I'm open to the character being investigated if she steps out of line, I'd prefer for that to be done naturally, via her RP hooks (if they make sense for a scene). If you haven't learned a piece of information from me ICly - be it in PRPs, or otherwise - play it on the safe side, and assume that a) you don't know it, b) you have no reason to suspect that anything strange it going on, c) anything and everything falls under the house rules for Sniping. If it does become known, I am just as firm a believer in ICA=ICC as anyone. Sandra's history could catch up with her at any moment, and she knows that. My only request is that, when it does, it isn't because someone checked under the hood and found a loophole.