Difference between revisions of "Conn/Trod Contract"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2) FAFO | 2) FAFO | ||
| − | While using my Trod to access the Dreaming, the Escheat is to be adhered. It is defined by Count Sienna as defined in appendix one. My personal definition is a subset thereof, if you break it I am likely to hold you accountable ('''F'''uck '''A'''round and '''F'''ind '''O'''ut.) | + | While using my Trod to access the Dreaming, the Escheat is to be adhered. It is defined by Count Sienna as defined in appendix one<ref>[https://cityofhopemush.net/index.php/Escheat Appendix One], Ethan's interpretation</ref>. My personal definition is a subset thereof, if you break it I am likely to hold you accountable ('''F'''uck '''A'''round and '''F'''ind '''O'''ut.) |
3) Right of Safe Haven | 3) Right of Safe Haven | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
There are Prodigals. Some can see us. I let specific ones see us through Enchanting. This does not breach Right of Ignorance. See Rule 1. | There are Prodigals. Some can see us. I let specific ones see us through Enchanting. This does not breach Right of Ignorance. See Rule 1. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:37, 20 April 2021
1) Demesne
Access to the Trod in the VIP Room is subject to my permission, Fae or not. This is established via the Right of Demesne. If you cannot open a Trod safely without Unleashing, ask me. If I am not there, ask Charlie to call me. If he can't get in touch, wait.
2) FAFO
While using my Trod to access the Dreaming, the Escheat is to be adhered. It is defined by Count Sienna as defined in appendix one[1]. My personal definition is a subset thereof, if you break it I am likely to hold you accountable (Fuck Around and Find Out.)
3) Right of Safe Haven
You don't bring Vampires past the VIP door. If a vampire can see us and you bring them into the Murder, I will hold you to have broken the Escheat and act accordingly.
4) Right of Ignorance
There are Prodigals. Some can see us. I let specific ones see us through Enchanting. This does not breach Right of Ignorance. See Rule 1.
- ↑ Appendix One, Ethan's interpretation
